Storms in the Clouds.

The Cloud is a concept of moving data and computing off our local machines, and onto servers, usually somewhere on the internet.  The cloud concept is one of the major factors of the success of smartphones and touchpad devices. The storage capacity and computing power is moved off line. gaming is made even more exciting by interactive play between users. The linkage and technical bookkeeping  done in “the clouds”

The past few days though have exposed the potential issues of computing in the clouds. Amazon had a huge crash that took down a bunch of sites and lost data for many businesses

There’s no doubt that the recent “partial failure” of the Amazon Web Services cloud computing platform is giving enterprises, service providers, and developers pause–and will continue to do so for months to come. Amazon called the outage “partial” and a “degradation,” but it was a very big deal. A significant part of Amazon’s flagship EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) was offline for a day, as were the related EBS (Elastic Block Store) and RDS(Relational Database Service) offerings. The failure affected only the northern Virginia data center (“US-East”), and the majority of AWS services continued to run just fine. But for the customers whose hosted IT was down, there was nothing partial about it; their sites and applications were substantially or completely offline. These included marquee Web properties like Foursquare, Formspring, HootSuite, and Reddit, among hundreds of others.

Upping the ante, the failure propagated across multiple “availability zones,” which are supposed to use physically distinct, independent infrastructure with no shared components–precisely to make such failure propagation impossible. Ooops! and OOOPS!! Even worse, it turns out that Amazon permanently lost some customer data. There probably is no greater sin in information technology than losing a customer’s data.

Sony also had to shut down its PlayStation Network, the private information including Credit card information of 77 million users are now owned by unscrupulous hackers.  Sony who is no stranger to hacking has shut  down the system for over a week now.  Perhaps people don’t understand how disreputable Sony has behaved in the past about hacking, and stealing gnu code,  while they participate in pursuing downloaders, It is curious that so many  would give Sony credit card information over the internet with their reputation for technological thuggery and heavy handedness.  Be careful with whom you do business.

The lesson learned thought is twofold.

  1. Some of these cloud functions and services are experimental. Google still calls many of its older services ‘beta’ Amazon has what they thought was a bulletproof system. Like they say “Shit happens”  a series of events that weren’t understood beforehand is what caused their catastrophe.  The end result will very likely a better more powerful Borg system.
  2. Be careful with whom you do business.  A company that hacks its customers computers, shouldn’t be trusted, and will attract other hackers and other disreputable types.  I might be Ludite, but maybe we would be just a little more circumspect about putting our credit card information out. There are other game platforms out there that haven’t actively hacked its customers computers.

 

Remembering the Osborne

This is the 3oth anniversary of the Osborne 1 the first portable computer. The Z80 machine had 64k of memory and 2 floppys, a 5 inch amber display. and came with CPM and a decent office suite. At a Price  of about $1,8000 it was concidered a pretty good deal.

At first, they seem to belong in completely different weight categories. Osborne 1 is just under 11 kg, enough to pull your arm out of the socket, if you’re a skinny geek. That’s roughly 20 times more than an iPad, or about the same as whole suitcase of them.

But what about the processing power? Osbourne 1 was sporting a Z80 CPU, running at a stunning frequency of 4.0 MHz. You cannot compare the different architectures directly, but iPad’s CPU is a dual core A5, clocked at up to 1 GHz. That’s approximately three hundred times more, not counting in the vastly superior architecture.

Z80 CPU was supported by whopping 64KB of system memory. Surprisingly, it was enough to run databases, word processors and complex, professional software. Today’s iPad is equipped with 512MB of RAM (roughly eight thousand times more), and some reviewers complain it’s a bit on the low side.

Although it may be worth noting that the the Osborne 1 allowed removable storage and that you could actually connect it dirrectly to a printer. The Osborne didn’t support Flash either.

Now let’s compare storage. iPad offers you 16GB of flash memory in basic configuration. Osborne 1 doesn’t have anything to write home about, even though it was a well specced machine in its days. It has a dual 5.25 inch floppy disk drive, each disk holding 110KB of data. An upgrade was possible to more modern, “dual density” drive with 360KB floppies. Even with the maximum theoretical storage of 720KB, Osborne had 20,000 times less disk space than iPad. Well, it was never meant to hold music videos and MP3’s. Each disk was enough for 1600 pages of text, and it was thought to be an impressive feat.

It’s not only about power and storage, though. It’s about what a device can actually DO with the resources, as without good software all those MHz’s ad KB’s are for nothing. Osborne was particularly well equipped for its time, it came with a self-configuring CP/M 2.2 OS (which would launch a program automatically after inserting a disk – a novelty for the time). It had a WordStarword processor, SuperCalc spreadsheet, BASIC programming language, and a dBASE II database. You could work on it from day one – and it was a huge leap in terms of user friendliness. In early 80’s most machines were sold without any software. Sometimes there was no software at all, and the user was supposed to write all the necessary programs himself (take Altair for example). Be as it may, Osborne’s three apps pale in comparison to iPad’s array of pre-installed stuff, and hundreds of thousands of programs in App Store.

 

Apple Censorship

When is burning books or  censorship a good idea?

When the ideas being promoted contradict you you own.

Apple is under pressure to delist an an app that promises to cure homosexuality.

The free app is provided by Exodus International, a ministry group that “cites homosexual tendencies as one of many conditions that beset fallen humanity,” according to its website. The app includes updates from the group, as well as a schedule of upcoming events at which pastors, counselors and others can be trained. Exodus also includes stories from people who write that the service freed them “of the bondage of unwanted same-sex attraction.”

Gay rights groups such as Truth Wins Out have organized an online petition calling for Apple to remove the app from its store; as of Monday afternoon, the petition had more than 100,000 signatures. The petition says the app is “hateful and bigoted,” and the message that homosexuality is something to overcome could be particularly damaging to young people. “It creates, legitimizes, and fuels the ostracism of LGBT youth by their families,” Truth Wins Out says.

Apple has a policy that allow them discretion on ruling against offencive apps. By offirg to be a gate keeper of whats decent and proper they expose themselves to this type controversy. They become the censors.

The guidelines put Apple in the position of judging what is offensive — a precarious spot when sensitive issues like gay rights and religion are involved. In the past, Apple has removed other apps when many people complained about their content; the Guardian points out that an app called Manhattan Declaration that opposed gay rights and gay marriage was withdrawn from the store last year.

Facebook too has come under fire over content and offensiveness. But Facebook generally has come down on the side of promoting speech, and Exodus International maintains a page on the social-networking site, apparently without incident.

Apple likely wouldn’t face such questions about apps in its store if it took a stance similar to Google’s or Facebook’s, but that’s the price Apple pays for curating products for customers.

Apples position of deciding what content is best for us,  whether their decision is  based on business compatibility as in their boycott of Flash or intellectual.  The decision is best  left with the consumer. We don’t need Big brother or My 2 Mommies dictating what is proper.

Daylight Savings

It is all based on a lie.  The government figures it can give people more daylight by time shifting our clocks.   This all sounds good, but we all know that in any given day there is 24 hours. and the proportion of it is determined by the laws of science, geometry, and God. Washington has nothing to do with it.  What daylight savings time really does is give us one more hour at night and one less in the morning.  Apparently our government in its wisdom has determined for all of us that evening daylight in the summer has more value than evening daylight.

it has the a negative effect of extending the rising sun for morning commuters to drive into the sun. In fact changing of the clocks kills a few people every year. Although the Washington Times tends to blame the loss of sleep.

There have likewise been oft-repeated claims that DST saves lives by cutting traffic accidents. After all, we all know that driving in the dark is more dangerous, so it stands to reason that pushing sunset back an hour should cut crashes.

But while some studies found no meaningful overall effect, and some slight benefit, at least a few studies found that traffic accidents climbed as much as 7 percent in the days immediately after switching to DST – because drivers are more tired from losing the hour of sleep. And these studies found that accidents didn’t go down nearly as much after the clocks fall back.

I do know we are all better off when the Government just leaves us and our clocks alone.

Browser Wars

In the browser wars for market share . Microsoft Internet Explorer still commands the lead but market share is fading, While the new kid on the block Google’s “Chrome” breaks the 10% barrier and Opera barely exist anymore.   Chrome gains popularity because of its light use of the the deskspace fas loading and aggressive stance on HTML5 while Firefox is has high hopes in the promised 4.0 release. Internet Explore continues to fade away in popularity because the newest versions will not run on other operating systems or even on older Microsoft operating Systems.

Firefox seems unable to be able to capture the lost IE share, probably because its gaining a reputation of being bloated and slow. Firefox and Chrome run on most versions of Apple, Windows and Linux. There is a lot of competition and investment for software that no-one will ever pay for.

The Borg Wiki

I have been playing with a new installation on my in home server, and installed a full blown wiki.  Its pretty good software, but I’m not sure just how I want to use it.  Its just internal now, but it wouldn’t be a difficult to get a domain name for it and go public with it.  Mostly though I’m thinking it would make a great database.

It can be found here for now, but Comcast is likely to the IP address before too long.

Update: 1/15/2012:  Changed IP Address to a URL which should have more perminance.

 

Chrome in the Clouds

Google is Beta testing its new Operating System, Chrome and getting lots of press for it. To get the OS tested by as many different people, Google is giving away netbooks with the Chrome OS installed. They are giving away thousands of these things, which by all reports are pretty nice little machines.

The whole notebook has a high-quality soft touch feel (it reminds me of the G1 or the back of the EVO) which doesn’t attract fingerprints and wipes of nicely. The touchpad is huge and flush. The display is matte and pretty high-res for its size, its hinge is extremely sturdy, and the lack of branding anywhere on the notebook is absolutely beautiful. Physically, this is a high-end notebook.

Inside it’s a bit more modest a 1.6 Gig Atom Single Core processer. with a 16 Gig Flash drive. Google is giving away 60,ooo of these puppys, this not only gives them a great opportunity to test the OS, but it also gives them a lot of internet chatter and publicity. Continue reading

Keeping Secrets

Irony found at the Instapundit:

DAVID BERNSTEIN ON WIKILEAKS: “The harm to U.S. diplomatic and military interests is said to be quite large. I’m glad Koh is sending Julian Assange of Wikileaks a stern letter of reprimand, that will show him! Who said the Obama Administration wasn’t tough enough to protect American interests?”

UPDATE: Reader David Shimm emails:

Why is it that Wikileaks has been able to publish all kinds of classified State Dept. documents, but Obama’s Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard Law transcripts still remain confidential? Maybe we should have a university registrar’s office consult with the US government to assure that secrets remain secret? I’m just wondering, that’s all.

In my experience, university registrars are formidable and competent. Apparently the same can’t be said for the folks entrusted with our national secrets.

Most folks seem to be focused on Assange, a few are blaming  Manning, the PFC that actually leaked this stuff. The real blame lies with whoever made the decision to allow so much classified information to be accessible by hundreds of thousands.  Secrets that are shared by hundreds of thousands are not  real secrets.

Keeping the Homeland Secure

The Department of Homeland Security shut down about 75 sites.  Some are are sites that offer inexpensive alternatives to expensive designer items.  Others sites that are search engines that help users find  torrent links on the web.

Aside from the fact that domains are being seized seemingly at will, there is a very serious problem with the action against Torrent-Finder. Not only does the site not host or even link to any torrents whatsoever, it actually only returns searches through embedded iframes which display other sites that are not under the control of the Torrent-Finder owner.

Torrent-Finder remains operational through another URL, Torrent-Finder.info, so feel free to check it out for yourself. The layouts of the sites it searches are clearly visible in the results shown.

While it may not be be obvious to most us what this has to doi with the security of the nation, it may have a lot to do with the fatcats who donated to the the Democrats, and to President Obama’s Campaign.

HOMELAND SECURITY is seizing Internet domains left and right. It’s not clear what protecting fatcat entertainment folks’ copyrights has to do with homeland security, though.

UPDATE: Protecting Rappers instead of the border. “What the devil are these idiots doing? . . . This is a case for the music industry’s lawyers — not the $35 billion-a-year Department of Homeland Security.” Well, to be fair, the entertainment industries make a lot of political contributions to Democrats.

It should be noted that torrent sites do not offer copyrighted materials, just the links or the small files called torrents which provide the identification and data to enable a user with the correct peer to peer software to exchange data.  There is a lot of proper and perfectly  legal files  also exchanged in this manor. In fact this is the preferred method to get updates on much of FOSS software such as Ubuntu O/S ,

Seems as though the government is turning on the heat Torrent users may wish to turn off their trackers in their torrents to avoid attracting attention.  Just Sayin’

Homeland Security seems oblivious to the part they are playing in bringing the current administration down.  The unpopularity of the the strip and grope of the TSA, Real terrorist seem to be getting more active, and our almost non existing border security,  They are really proving to have their heads inserted up their buttocks.

.

Stuxnet 007

Maybe more like a job for James Phelps and the Impossible Mission Force:

In the 20th century, this would have been a job for James Bond.

The mission: Infiltrate the highly advanced, securely guarded enemy headquarters where scientists in the clutches of an evil master are secretly building a weapon that can destroy the world. Then render that weapon harmless and escape undetected.

But in the 21st century, Bond doesn’t get the call. Instead, ththe job is handled by a suave and very sophisticated secret computer worm, a jumble of code called Stuxnet, which in the last year has not only crippled Iran’s nuclear program but has caused a major rethinking of computer security around the globe.

Fox News does a good job explaining in non-technese, the damage done, how Stuxnet was spread and how it infiltrates some pretty tight security. They also provide some insight into who may have built the trojan.

Langer argues that no single Western intelligence agency had the skills to pull this off alone. The most likely answer, he says, is that a consortium of intelligence agencies worked together to build the cyber bomb. And he says the most likely confederates are the United States, because it has the technical skills to make the virus, Germany, because reverse-engineering Sieman’s product would have taken years without it, and Russia, because of its familiarity with both the Iranian nuclear plant and Sieman’s systems

A good story and excellent reporting, although they never mentioned the most responsible for the incident were those who decided to use MSoft in what should ham been a secure application.  Being stupid has consequences.  Fortunately the Iranian government isn’t all that smart, and Seimens isn’t getting the rap they deserve for allowing this to happen.